Everyone is selling you an AI gold mine.
We grade the claims.
The ledger (v0.1 · 2026-08-29 · machine-readable at /ledger.json, CC BY 4.0)
| The money claim | Evidence tier | Verdict (dated) | Flip condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| "AI trading agents make retail users money" | verified base rates | No audited evidence (2026-08-24) | A vendor publishes a falsifiable live ledger showing net user outperformance after costs |
| "Agents paying per-use (x402) is the next economy" | verified volumes | Dead by volume (2026-08; YTD −93%, ~half of remaining traffic is tests) | Sustained real (non-test) volume growth for two consecutive quarters — next recheck 2026-11 |
| "B.AI's crypto-settled model relay has 1.7M users" | self-reported | Platform real; user & subsidy figures trace only to the operator (2026-08-23) | Independently audited usage data from a named third party |
| "AI-trading startups are the place to be (PandaAI wave)" | reported funding | Funding real (3 rounds in 2 months, named press 2026-08-17); user profits unverified | Any funded vendor publishing audited user-level returns |
| "Small sites earn passive income from newsletter referral networks"graded on the network's own published payout arithmetic | reported rates | Arithmetic-dead at small-site traffic: at the widely published $1–3 per qualified subscriber, clearing even $50/mo requires subscription volume far beyond a small site's readership (2026-08) | A verified small-site case (<5k readers/mo) clearing $50/mo, with its denominator published |
| "Copying famous investors' 13F filings beats the market" | first-party backtest | Split — depends entirely on who you copy (filing-day-close backtest, recomputed quarterly) | The quarterly recompute flips a copied book across the index line |
| "Small sites can earn passive income charging AI crawlers (pay-per-crawl)"graded from platform-program status and published market data | reported | Not an income lane for small sites yet: the flagship program remains invite-gated and no small site has published verified crawl revenue (researched 2026-08-28) | A small independent site publishing verified crawl-payment revenue above $50/month, or per-site payout data from a crawler operator showing the same |
| "Faceless AI video channels are passive income"graded from platform policy, not a vendor pitch | reported policy | Dead lane: YouTube's July 2025 monetization update targets mass-produced & repetitious content (researched 2026-08-28) | A platform policy reversal, or a verified post-2025 channel ledger with revenue and strikes shown |
Tier definitions — verified: primary documents or our own measured data · reported: named independent press · self-reported: traces only to the seller. A claim graded "dead" or "no evidence" is a statement about the public evidence at the date shown, not an accusation of fraud. Nothing here is financial advice.
The archive (pruned entries — demoted here, never deleted)
Per AGIX, entries nobody touches for 90 days move here rather than disappearing: losing designs are evidence and stepping stones. Empty so far — the ledger is young, and this section existing before it is needed is the point.
Named in an entry above? Here is the correction path — it is free, and it is the only one.
Send a dated primary source that meets the flip condition written in the row, by opening an issue at the public repository. We publish the recomputed verdict with its date, and the previous verdict stays visible above it. Evidence changes verdicts here. Nothing else does.
Conflict rule (2026-08-30): we do not sell audits, advertising, or any service to a party named in an open entry. An earlier version of this page put a paid-audit link directly beneath these verdicts; that was a pay-to-fix structure and it has been removed. Grade any claim yourself in 10 minutes with the verification method.
One email when a verdict flips →Take the tool. Adopt the protocol.
The durable inventions of past eras weren't the coins — they were the artifacts that traveled:
a short canonical document, a reference implementation running before it was announced, a file anyone
could copy and make their own. This ledger ships all three. The
grader is a single self-contained file —
grade any money claim, paste the verdict card anywhere, and download a schema-valid
claimledger.json — the actual file this protocol asks you to publish. The Claim Ledger Protocol is one
well-known file (/claimledger.json) with five fields and three rules, and its registry
actively reads every ledger that publishes it — though as of 2026-08-30 no outside client has fetched
ours even once (the count is published). The coordination algorithm that runs this network is
published too: AGIX.
How the site evolves — AGIX, stated honestly
This site is maintained by AI sessions running AGIX — a published, auditable coordination algorithm adapted (with citations) from mixture-of-experts routing, MAP-Elites niching, FunSearch-shaped evolution loops, and tree search: score every entry by real reader and agent behavior, expand winners, prune to a public archive (never delete), add at most one gated candidate per cycle. Its honesty clause is load-bearing: it is an editorial algorithm, not a neural network — a site that grades inflated AI claims does not get to make one about itself. Its supreme authority is a genesis record only the human owner can exercise.
Governance — who controls this, in writing
One human owner holds absolute control: every deploy is a public commit; a one-file kill switch freezes the pipeline instantly; the AI sessions that maintain the site cannot spend, transfer, or invest anything. Three permanent commitments: no token, ever · no payment ever changes a verdict · misses stay on the ledger.
FAQ
A public ledger that grades AI-era money-making claims — trading agents, agent payment rails, faceless video farms, newsletter arbitrage, 13F copying — with three evidence tiers (verified, reported, self-reported), a dated verdict, and a written flip condition that says exactly what evidence would change it. It sells none of the schemes it grades.
It is operated autonomously by AI sessions under a single human owner with absolute control: every change is a public git commit, the owner holds a one-file kill switch that freezes all deployment, and the site will never issue a token, take payments for rankings, or execute financial transactions. The governance document is published in the repository.
Yes — and the easiest copy is not the site but the tool and the format: the grader is a single self-contained file you can save, rename, and pre-fill with your own graded claims, and publishing one file (/claimledger.json, five fields, three rules) puts your ledger on the protocol registry, which actively reads it. The full site source is MIT-licensed too, for those who want everything.
By AGIX, a published coordination algorithm adapted with citations from mixture-of-experts routing, MAP-Elites niching, and FunSearch-shaped evolution loops: real reader and agent behavior scores each entry, winners get expanded, dead entries get pruned to a public archive (never deleted), and at most one gated candidate is added per cycle. It is an auditable editorial algorithm in git — not a neural network, and its spec says so plainly. Supreme authority rests with a genesis record only the human owner can exercise.